Pages

MQM announces candidates for election 2013

Sunday, May 26, 2013

QUETTA: Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) central provincial leader, Senator Dr Muhammad Ali Brohi has announced the names of its candidates for Balochistan seats.
Addressing a press conference here at Quetta Press Club on Tuesday, he claimed that MQM was the only party that represented all the communities of the country.
Dr Brohi said that the party would file candidates from seven National Assembly and 21 provincial assembly seats to contest in general election in Balochistan.
He said that candidates in the run for national assembly seats were Muhammad Juma Changazi for NA-259 (Quetta City) Prince Abdul Baqi Baloch for NA-260 (Quetta Chagai), Anwar Khan Tareen for NA-261 (Pishin, Ziarat) Sanaullah Marghazani for NA- 265 (Sibi, Kohlu) Shabaaz Khan Umrani for NA-266 (Nasirabad, Jaffarabad), Abdul Razaq Lashari for NA- 267 (Jhal Magsi) and Ghulam Farooq Shahwani for NA-268 (Mastung, Kalat).
He said MQM candidates contesting provincial election are: Anwar Khan Tareen PB-1 (Quetta), Muhammad Ibrahim Hazara PB-2 (Quetta), Malik Imranullah Kakar, PB-3 , Shah Faisal Rind PB-4 (Quetta), Muhammad Aslam Shahwani PB-5 (Quetta), Nematullah PB-6 (Quetta), Sardar Bashir Ahmad Achakzai PB-11 (Chaman), Muhammad Sulaiman Bulaidi PB-21 (Sibi), Wali Muhammad Bugti PB-24 (Dera Bugti), Ehsanullah Magsi Advocate PB-25 (Usta Muhammad), NasirAhmad Khosa PB-26 (Dera Allahyar), Muhammad Hussain Khosa PB-27 (Suhbatpur), Abdul Malik Jamali PB-28 (Dera Murad Jamali) Mushtaq Ali Umrani PB-29 (Tambo), Jan Muhammad Abro PB-(Bhag), Ghulam Farooq Shahwani PB-38 (Mastung) Ashiq Ali Hussaini PB-39 (Chagai), Jamil Ahmad Mengal PB-40 (Noshki).

At least 25 party-lists secure congressional seats

MANILA, Philippines - Commission on Elections commissioner (Comelec) Grace Padaca released on Wednesday a list of 25 leading party-list groups in the official tallies of the National Board of Canvassers.
Buhay Party-list has kept its top spot with 1,255,734 votes so far, while A Teacher follows with 1,033,873 votes as reflected in 95 percent of all certificates of canvass (COC) including provinces and municipalities.
Progressive party-list Bayan Muna comes third with 945,639 votes, followed by rural energy group 1-CARE having 931,303 votes and social democratic party Akbayan with 820,351 votes.
Regional group Ako Bicol, the front running party-list in the 2010 polls, has ranked only sixth this year with 761,115 votes while agriculture-oriented Abono is seventh with 753,161.
Completing the list are:
8. OFW Family - 735,854
9. Gabriela - 706,194
10. Senior Citizens - 671,916
11. COOP-NATCCO - 640,180
12. AGAP - 588,095
13. CIBAC - 578,320
14. Magdalo - 561,613
15. An Waray - 540,210
16. Abamin - 465,192
17. Act Teachers - 449,710
18. Butil - 437,084
19. ACT-CIS - 371,309
20. Amin - 370,351
21. LPGMA - 369,989
22. Kalinga - 367,839
23. TUCP - 365,299
24. YACAP - 364,278
25. AGRI - 363,204
With only a remaining 5 percent of COCs left to be tallied, groups that reached the quota of at least 2 percent of all party-list votes cast are likely to have secured a seat for their nominees in the House of Representatives.
Comelec's initial computation showed that 200,000 to 206,000 votes mark the two-percent quota. The NBOC prefers, however, to wait for all COCs to be completed before the definitive quota is established.
As of Wednesday afternoon, meanwhile, mostly canvass certificates from overseas voting precincts are left to be considered.
Succeeding two-percent of votes earned will grant another nominee of each party-list a position in Congress.
The country's party-list system grants 20 percent of all congressional seats to sectoral groups.
In 2010, 41 seats were given to party-list representatives with 16 seats left unfilled.

Election winners told: Disclose poll expenses

MANILA, Philippines - A re-elected congressman on Tuesday urged his fellow winners in the 2013 polls to start fully disclosing all their expenditures and transactions during the elections. 
Re-elected Quezon City Rep. Winston Castelo said all expenditures and disbursements of items and election paraphernalia should be posted on websites, newspapers, and other publicly accessible places  for the sake of accountability and transparency.
 
Castelo said a summary of all incomes and revenues from both public and private sources of elected officials should also be made.
 
“Public trust is a basic ingredient in the government’s menu of transparency, accountability and good governance. This will serve public notice how timely and prompt disclosure will effectively plug possible holes for graft and corruption in the local bureaucracy level,” Castelo said in a statement.
 
The re-elected lawmaker had filed the measure "Local Government Transactions Disclosure Act of 2012," which seeks to amend portions of the Local Government Code.
 
The bill mandates the full disclosure and posting of the annual budget, quarterly statement of cash flows, statement of receipts and expenditures, among other public finances.
 
"I will push for the passage of this measure in the 16th Congress," he said.

Election 2013 results — an outcome of anti-US policy?

The inability to address the energy crisis, law and order situation, lack of efforts towards party organisation, absence of real ‘jayala’ and loyal leadership on the forefront and somehow conversion of masses’ party, having roots in the communities, towards party of drawing room must be the factors behind the PPP’s failure in the election. 

However, there might be some other reasons as well which must have contributed towards its loss to such an extent. 

It was quite obvious that the PPP is going to lose the election but it is surprising to see PPP even losing almost all of the Punjab, including the seat of Qamar Zaman Kaira who has remained so devoted towards his constituents throughout his tenure in office without even facing a single charge of corruption; the seat of former prime minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf who used massive funds in his constituency for the well-being of the people of the area; and many seats in south Punjab, the region which should have been PPP’s stronghold due to its massive campaigning for Saraiki province. 

However, it was not as bad performance as the perception was built through the media. There was something good on previous government’s part as well. The 17th, 18th and 19th amendments, which directly or indirectly impacts masses; the 7th NFC Award, which addresses small provinces’ grievances so effectively; FATA reforms, which brought the people of FATA in mainstream politics and helped in ending the practice of collective responsibility and collective punishment for children, women and people over the age of 65; Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) through which the enrolled 5.5 million families have not only been paid cash assistance of Rs 1,000 per month on a quarterly basis, but also benefits have been provided under the graduation strategy, like the long-term, interest-free, returnable financial assistance; vocational and technical training; and health and life insurance coverage. 

The agricultural policies of the former government had enabled farmers to earn an additional income of approximately Rs 900 billion during the last two years alone. Pakistan became a wheat-exporting country from a wheat-importing country. The sector had undergone a healthy revolution that changed the lives of even those ordinary farmers who owned less than five acres of land. 

Each of the above-mentioned steps was somehow a revolutionary measure if studied in detail. But none of these steps were eulogised in the private media, as they should have been. 

It can be admitted that bad governance, energy crisis and law and order issues must be the factors that overshadowed these achievements and resulted in the outcomes of these elections. But what about the governance of the PML-N in Punjab? Was it good enough to enable PML-N to gain this much in the election? The answer must be in a big no. 

The law and order situation in Punjab deteriorated. An overall increase in crimes was witnessed by 12 percent, with crimes against property increasing by 37 percent, robbery by 109 percent, murder by 15 percent and rape by 22 percent. 

Crimes against minorities in Shantinagar, Gojra and Badami Bagh depict horrible track record of the party in protecting the lives and rights of non-Muslims. Article 157 of the constitution gave explicit authority to the provinces to undertake energy projects, but nothing had been done in this regard.

Given this track record, why in the election the PPP failed so badly and the PML-N gained so massively? How PML-N, all of sudden, started leading the national and international surveys, which the PTI was leading? Was there a shift in the establishment’s priority from the PTI to the PML-N? Was the media intentionally creating conducive environment for the PML-N? Why the ECP failed in the conduct of free and fair election, particularly in Punjab and Karachi? Was it the former government’s shift in the foreign policy that resulted in these outcomes? Does the US need a leader in Pakistan who can protect its interests in the region? These are the questions that need to be addressed.

Opinion polls predict Nawaz Sharif poised to win May 11 general elections in Pakistan


After 14 years out of power, Nawaz Sharif is a man in a hurry.
As his motorcade speeds to another campaign rallynawazsharifahead of a general election next week, the politician tipped to be Pakistan‘s next prime minister is frank about what he will inherit – “a mess”.
“The challenges are huge,” the portly Sharif said in his bullet-proof car. “We have to bail out the economy.”
With the nuclear-armed nation in crisis after decades of either military or socialist rule, it’s a job few might be able to handle. Sharif, who vows to bring in free market enterprise and ease economic controls, says speedy growth is the only answer.
According to opinion polls, his Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) is expected to win the May 11 general election after capitalising on the failures of the outgoing Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), a left-leaning party.
The powerful military still calls the shots in Pakistan but it is the first time that an election is being held to decide on a transition between civilian governments. Nevertheless, the new prime minister will have to work with the generals, who control foreign policy and security.
The new civilian government will also have to play its part in Pakistan‘s difficult relationship with the United States. Washington has a deep alliance with Pakistan, but is troubled by elements in the country supporting Islamic militants fighting U.S. troops in neighbouring Afghanistan.
Osama bin Laden was found and killed in a Pakistani town in 2011.
In addition, the economy is stuttering. Chronic power cuts have infuriated Pakistanis and crippled key industries. Corruption and poverty are rampant, and infrastructure is crumbling.
Sharif seems to have matured as a politician since he was toppled by former army chief and president Pervez Musharraf in a bloodless coup in 1999.
As the main opposition leader, he has avoided antagonising Pakistan‘s powerful generals, or bringing down the unpopular PPP-led coalition government when it was in trouble.
Instead, he waited patiently for an opportunity to rule and now that his moment has come, he is in a hurry to fixPakistan. Sharif however acknowledges that if he wins, the honeymoon will be short.
Need for reform
Pakistan needs billions of dollars from donors to avert a balance of payments crisis but the cash may not flow to the South Asian nation unless politically sensitive economic reforms are implemented.
So far, one politician after another has failed to muster the courage to bring change. Sharif’s background suggests he may have the stomach for it, based on his attempts in the past to reverse socialist policies and open up theeconomy.
“I think Nawaz Sharif will be very capable of making tough decisions,” said Zaffar Abbas, editor of Pakistan‘s Dawn newspaper. “He has proven this before.”
Sharif, who was born into a family of wealthy industrialists in 1949, served as prime minister twice in the 1990s, when he tried to promote free market policies. His family is from Lahore, the capital of Punjab, Pakistan‘s most prosperous and populous province.
Now he says he is willing to again risk a backlash, and cut government expenditure by 30 percent in order to secure international backing for the economy.
“You see privatisation, free market economy, deregulation – have been hallmarks of our party in government,” Sharif told Reuters. “We are going to pick up the threads from where we left off.”
Despite his reform credentials, Sharif may raise concerns in the West because of his conservative Islamic values: in 1991 he tried to make sharia the country’s supreme law.
More recently he has been accused of failing to act against militant groups which have a breeding ground in Punjab. He is one of the few major politicians not on the hit-list of Taliban insurgents who have vowed to disrupt the elections.
His two terms as prime minister in the 1990s were marred by allegations of graft and he ordered Pakistan‘s first nuclear tests in 1998.
The military connection
Nawaz was a protege of military dictator General Zia ul-Haq in the 1980s.
But he became a victim of the powerful military when he was overthrown by Musharraf. He was then convicted of corruption and given a life sentence for hijacking, because he refused to allow an airliner carrying Musharraf to land inPakistan.
Sharif went into exile in Saudi Arabia, but never lost hope of returning to politics one day.
“In private conversations, Nawaz still gets very emotional when he remembers that period,” said a senior journalist who has reported on Sharif for decades. “He has not forgotten being handcuffed and walking through the airport. His face still gets red in anger when he recalls those days.”
No surprise, then, that he now talks tough against the army meddling in civilian affairs – a risky stance in a country ruled by generals for more than half of its 66-year history, either through coups or from behind the scenes.
Sharif’s attempt to fire Musharraf as army chief ultimately cost him his job in 1999. If elected he will have to avoid any other errors in judgment, especially when it comes to Pakistan‘s top army officers.
Musharraf attempted a political comeback of his own in March when he returned after nearly four years of self-imposed exile hoping to contest the election.
Instead, he has been barred from public office for life and is under house arrest at his luxury farmhouse as cases against him grind through the courts.
With his nemesis humiliated and out of the picture, politics has come full circle for Sharif. He has patiently plotted his own return to the top from his lavish, 700-acre estate near Lahore where peacocks strut on the lawns.
“I think we have a track record. We have contributed to the country in the past,” said Sharif. “Wherever I have been during this campaign, the response of the people has been very emotional and charged.”

Editorial: Election 2013; PKKH Appeal to the Nation.

Finally the election campaign is over, taking a toll of 81 killed and 437 injured, and finally Pakistan is looking forward to the big day, when millions will turn out to vote tomorrow, for Elections2013.
Has democracy bore us its fruit, has this blind system of throwing the question upon a teaming 200million and making the answer evermore blur, benefitted us in the long run of six and a half decades? Have we upon embracing the tool of democracy for so many decades now, become a more prosperous, happier, more content nation? Do we, standing upon this model, lent from our occupiers, stand today, taller, more dignified or more prideful as a nation? No is the apparent answer.
Why has this happened, it’s simple! Tossing a question to 200million, and not considering the un-countable dynamics that can emerge or can be created, in a blind struggle for power, is like giving place to high levels of corruptions, to foster.  That is what has practically happened, wide-spread rigging, horse-trading, seat adjustments, intimidation of clans and baradaries, sheep-herding of unaware populace under false/temporary slogans, briberies, large scale false promises and what not, all have become part and parcel of a system cherished as an absolute by our elite.
So what should the people of Pakistan do now, now that Dhaka has already fallen, now that Iraq and Afghanistan have been savagely broken down in front of our eyes for more than a decade, now that Syria has been in fire and blood for 2 years, now that the Arab Spring has left its begetters in an equally indecisive and more corrupt state.  There are two answers for our nation; either we step into a revolution like the Arab Spring, of which we are clear that all such attempt have been abducted by vile forces, and that remains a possibility for us too, if we attempt. And the other answer is that we do the impossible!
The impossible for making the better vote, and killing the system with its own gun; breaking the status-quo and telling the elite democratic monarchs that if we gave you the mandate, we have the power to kick you out too. So until we wait for the real revolution, we need not keep our hands away from this soft revolution and give this message to our countrymen that they have to act sensible, one wise man behind every vote. Yes, this was the impossible, which was what the elite never suspected, there would never be one wise man behind one vote and we would always be able to manipulate, they thought.
But can the people of Pakistan, educate themselves today, that democracy means being able to whip the politicians with the whip every 5 years, and whoever has done the bad things, never ever give them your vote again.  Vote for the most trustworthy of the lot, be after him for the whole five years and blow him out if he wasn’t worth it. But it is not a matter of sarcasm, it is a matter of extreme retrospect and God-fearing.
PKKH appeals to the people of Pakistan, to be fully conscience upon the implications of these elections, in the local as well as the global scenario. We appeal to our people to take the matters in their hands, and make the politicians feel the whip of people’s power throughout the coming 5 years, by a full opposition and strict scrutiny in all public spheres. And if we are a Muslim people and a part of the Muslim Ummah, let us make that our vote and let us become a conscious force that will force our ruler upon the desired, corrected course, and vow not to sit dormant as the status quo trashes us down for another 5 years.
PKKH also appeals to the people of Pakistan, who are true believing people, upon the invincible, all hearing, all controlling, super power of all, Allah; they we should gather ourselves tonight and pray to our earnest and call upon our Allah to help us in this dire state we are in as a nation within and as a nation in the community of nations. That with His un-bounded grace, He returns His people to the glory once set for the courts of Qartabba,  Gharnatta, Ajnadain, but not decline and destruction they faced, at the hands of their unruly, untamed rulers. Let us pray tonight, that may Allah make us the ‘alive people’, who tame their rulers to the righteousness and not wait for fate anymore, with hands tied to our fists.  InshaAllah and Ameen

MQM establishes election cell for monitoring Elections-2013

KARACHI: A central Election Cell has been established at the Khursheed Begum Secretariat of the MQM for monitoring the General Elections of 2013.
A statement issued on Friday said that the workers and voters can call on 021 36329131, 02136313690, 02136808387 and 02136329955.
They can also contact through the email addresses electioncell@mqmpakistan.org and eccc@mqmpakistan.org
The statement said that people can get information about their polling stations and polling booths.
Complaints about any irregularity can also be made at the above numbers and by sending emails at the given addresses, it added.
 

SEO TOOLS

Election 2014

Most Reading

Tags